<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
				<!-- generator="e107" -->
				<!-- content type="Forum Threads" -->
				<rss  version="2.0" 
					xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" 
					xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
					xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
					xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"

				>
				<channel>
				<title>BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad! : Forum Threads</title>
				<link>/</link>
				<description></description>

<language>en-gb</language>
				<copyright>This site is powered by e107, which is released under the terms of the GNU GPL License.The contents of this site, and communications between this site and its users, are protected by database right, copyright, confidentiality and the right not to be intercepted conferred by section 1(3) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.  The use of those contents and communications by Internet Service Providers or others to profile or classify users of this site for advertising or other purposes is strictly forbidden.BadPhorm is hosted free of charge by DigitalDaemons</copyright>
				<managingEditor>admin@nospam.com (Jim Murray)</managingEditor>
				<webMaster>admin@nospam.com (Jim Murray)</webMaster>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:07:14 +0100</pubDate>
				<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:07:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
				<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
				<generator>e107 (http://e107.org)</generator>
				<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
				<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>

				<ttl>60</ttl>
<atom:link href="http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/rss_menu/rss.php?6.2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

					
<item>
<title>Adblock filter</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15694</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>Add to Adblock in personal filters option<br /><br />http://*$script,third-party<br /><br />blocks 3rd party scripts I am at present trying this instead of using noscript which i<br />personally find to be a pain. Found on website with discussion with author of Adblock but..<br /> Senior Moment ( getting more frequent :)   ) didnt bookmark it.<br /><br />P.</div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:40:35 +0100</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15694</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Yahoo Mail now allows HTTPS and SSL.</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15683</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div><span id="IntelliTXT">If you use Yahoo email, you can now use HTTPS &amp; SSL - but you'll need to activate it manually on your account as it is disabled by default - <a href="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2013/01/08/yahoo-mail-https-ssl/" target="window">http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2013/01/08/yahoo-mail-https-ssl/</a><br /><br />(Thank you perksie on the O2 forums for the heads up)</span></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>Peter N</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15683</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Will the internet end up controlled by big business and politicians?</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15680</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>It's all about control. Of course, nobody uses that particular term. The talk is always about "governance" or "regulation", but really it's about control. Ever since the internet burst into public consciousness in 1993, the big question has been whether the most disruptive communications technology since print would be captured by the established power structures – nation states and giant corporations – that dominate our world and shape its development. And since then, virtually every newsworthy event in the evolution of the network has really just been another skirmish in the ongoing war to control the internet.</div><div><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/23/internet-will-oligarchs-control-it">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/23/internet-will-oligarchs-control-it</a></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 02:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15680</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Confusion over parental Internet controls  Open Rights Group</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15679</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>Five days ago, the Department for Education announced a very reasonable approach to child protection online. Their plan was to make sure parents are supported in making easier, more informed decisions about how to keep their children safe online.<br /><br />This was based on a consultation that focused on evidence, engagement with stakeholders and soliciting to the views of parents and industry.<br /><br />But today the Prime Minister is singing a different tune. His article in the Daily Mail today suggests he is taking a more restrictive line, and that he wants to see 'default on' filtering. This has created a lot of confusion, seemingly just to satisfy the Daily Mail's editorial whims. Are they really to be the drivers of Internet policy?<br /><br />So, what is actually happening? Is this a 5 day policy about-turn?</div><div><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2012/confusion-over-parental-internet-controls">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2012/confusion-over-parental-internet-controls</a></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 02:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15679</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cameron decides he wants web porn censorship after all</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15678</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>UK PM David "one is an ordinary bloke" Cameron has apparently flip flopped on the issue of internet censorship because he is suddenly worried about children.<br /><br />Earlier this week, the government pulled out of plans to censor porn from the internet after a survey found that no one actually wanted it.<br /><br />Cameron thinks that the move's unpopularity makes it an ideal plank for Tory policy. After all, he has not done anything popular, such as sort the economy out, since he has been elected.<br /><br />Talking to his favourite organ, the Daily Mail, Cameron said that automatic porn blocking will be enforced. He has also employed MP Claire Perry, who has been campaigning for the default filtering throughout the year, as adviser on preventing the sexualisation of children.<br /><br />It seems that the man who feels it is ok to leave your kid in a pub is now lecturing parents on how to bring them up properly.</div><div><a href="http://news.techeye.net/internet/cameron-decides-he-wants-web-porn-censorship-after-all">http://news.techeye.net/internet/cameron-decides-he-wants-web-porn-censorship-after-all</a></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 01:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15678</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cameron defends U-turn on web filth ban, leaves filtering to parents</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15677</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>'Crude' ISP-level censorship WON'T work, says PM<br /><br />By Kelly Fiveash, Networks Correspondent • Get more from this author<br /><br />Posted in Broadband, 20th December 2012 13:04 GMT<br /><br />Free whitepaper – A Vision for the Data Centre<br /><br />Prime Minister David Cameron today reminded British families that they will be nudged by ISPs to consider blocking online pornography, self-harm websites and similar material at home.<br /><br />Crucially, he stopped short of installing the on-by-default "crude system" of network-level web filters promised earlier this year.<br /><br />The top Tory took to the pages of the Daily Mail this morning to explain the climbdown on filtering by his government, a change of heart that was welcomed by the telecoms industry.</div><div><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/david_cameron_filtering_smut_online/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/david_cameron_filtering_smut_online/</a></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15677</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Euro Commission abandons ACTA court request</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15676</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>ACTA is completely, finally, no-turning-back dead-and-buried in Europe, with the European Commission admitting that there is “no realistic chance” of the treaty being adopted in Europe.The frank assessment of the future of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement was made as the EC withdrew its request that the European Court of Justice examine the treaty’s compatibility with European law.<br /><div id="article-mpu-container"><div id="ad-mpu1-spot" class="ad-now" style="width: auto; height: auto; margin-top: 0px;"> </div>Earlier this year, the European Parliament <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/04/acta_rip/">rejected</a> the treaty, so the reference to the court was already largely a moot point.<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/acta_gets_last_last_rites/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/acta_gets_last_last_rites/</a></div></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15676</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dutch script kiddie pwns 20,000 Twitter profiles</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15672</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div>How much do you have in common with the other lusers?By <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #dd0000; font-weight: bold;" title="Send email to the author" href="http://forms.theregister.co.uk/mail_author/?story_url=/2012/12/14/twitter_hijack_prank/">John Leyden</a> • <a class="more-by-author" style="text-decoration: none; color: #dd0000; font-weight: bold;" title="More stories on this site by John Leyden" href="http://search.theregister.co.uk/?author=John%20Leyden">Get more from this author</a>Posted in <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #dd0000;" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/security/">Security</a>, <a style="text-decoration: none; color: #dd0000;" title="More stories published on this date" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/14/">14th December 2012 16:58 GMT</a><a style="text-decoration: none; color: #0000dd;" href="http://go.theregister.com/tl/724/-2673/-?td=wptl724" rel="noreferrer">Free whitepaper – Case Study: Global Company Transforms Culture with Cloud-Based Collaboration</a><div id="body" style="line-height: 1.5; margin: 1em 0px; font-family: Arial, FreeSans, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">A Dutch teenager successfully hijacked 20,000 Twitter profiles to post a message dissing their owners for being slack with security.Damien Reijnaers (<a style="text-decoration: none; color: #dd0000;" href="https://twitter.com/DamiaanR" rel="noreferrer" rel="external">@DamiaanR</a>), 16, also induced his victims into tipping their hat to him for helping them to point out the error of their ways in the same update. He pulled off the trick by getting victims to sign up to a supposed profile comparison tool for daters called Pas jij bij mij? (Do you match with me?) ... Users who linked his app to their Twitter accounts were asked to grant the application permission to post updates.<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/14/twitter_hijack_prank/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/14/twitter_hijack_prank/</a></div></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15672</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Seasons Greetings</title>
<link>http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15665</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br /><div><a href="http://www.graphicsgrotto.com/" class="bbcode" rel="external"> [ image disabled ] </a></div>]]></description>
<dc:creator>PingusPeriratus</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?15665</guid>
</item>


				</channel>
				</rss>